Hi Sean, Thank you. Figure 4 is provided as ** an example ** to illustrate how the flow ID can be placed on the NSH. This is not normative. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Sean Turner [mailto:sean@xxxxxxxxx] > Envoyé : mardi 29 mai 2018 16:19 > À : secdir@xxxxxxxx > Cc : draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical.all@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; sfc@xxxxxxxx > Objet : Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-08 > > Reviewer: Sean Turner > Review result: Ready > > Hi! I’m no expert on SFC so I spent some time reviewing RFC7665 and Simon > Josefsson’s secdir review [0] as well as RFC 8300 and 8393. It looks like > all > the things I was going to pick on are addressed by the references. > > I’ll let somebody else on the IESG debate whether Figure 4 is trying to be a > little different than the rest of this architectural document by specify some > protocols bits; informational still? > > [0] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-sfc-architecture-08-secdir-lc- > josefsson-2015-05-28/
