Joel - I am not an author of this draft - but I am an author on the referenced IS-IS draft - which I assume is one of the drafts mentioned in your comment: > Server). Looking at the relevant routing protocol document, they point to > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-05 as the > defining source for the SRMS. The IGP document references in the ldp-interop draft are stale. Newer versions of the IGP drafts have been published and they no longer reference draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution - a draft which is no longer active. HTH Les > -----Original Message----- > From: spring <spring-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Joel Halpern > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 1:01 PM > To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx > Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop.all@xxxxxxxx; > spring@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing- > ldp-interop-11 > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for > the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11 > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review Date: 2018-05-14 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-05-24 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This document appears to be ready for publication as an RFC. The > question of whether it is an Informational RFC or a Proposed Standards track > RFC is one that the ADs should examine. > > Major issues: > This document is quite readable, and quite useful. If my reading below > (minor comment about section 4.2) is wrong, then everything is fine. > However, reading the text, it does not appear to define SRMS. Rather, it > describes a good way to use SRMS to achive smooth SR - LDP integration > and > migration. As such, this seems to me to be a really good Informational > Document. > > Minor issues: > Section 4.2 states that it defines the SRMS (Segment Routing Mapping > Server). Looking at the relevant routing protocol document, they point to > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-05 as the > defining source for the SRMS. And that document does appear to define > the > SRMS. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
