Le 14/05/2018 à 16:34, Christian Huitema a écrit :
On May 14, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
<alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
An IPv6 Draft on an IPv6 server is no more of a rant than a claim
of IPv6 full access on an IPv6 access network.
Nobody prevents you from placing a copy of an internet draft on an
IPv6 only server. But by definition a document only becomes an
internet draft if it is published in the internet draft repository.
Part of the process is that it becomes widely available, and the
authors do not control the publication process.
I want to control the publication process of what I write, in some cases.
In most cases I am very happy with the publication process of IETF.
You can absolutely publish notes on an IPv6 only site -- the IPv6
turtle was a well known example. But those documents are not internet
drafts.
Is an "Internet Note" a qualified naming at IETF? I think I heard
"Internet Engineering Note" or something like that. Maybe that is what
you meant...
As for the turtle, yes.
This is the list of websites I am aware of that give better content if
accessed on IPv6:
http://www.kame.net
http://dnslabs.nl
(humbly) http://petrescu.sandelman.ca
Alex
-- Christian Huitema
