Ditto. This change is if anything overdue. Ned > I fully agree with and support this status change. > Barry > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:20 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The IESG has received a request from DMARC WG to make the > > following status changes: > > > > - RFC4405 from Experimental to Historic > > (SMTP Service Extension for Indicating the Responsible Submitter of an > > E-Mail Message) > > > > - RFC4406 from Experimental to Historic > > (Sender ID: Authenticating E-Mail) > > > > - RFC4407 from Experimental to Historic > > (Purported Responsible Address in E-Mail Messages) > > > > The supporting document for this request can be found here: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-change-sender-id-to-historic/ > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2018-06-06. Exceptionally, comments may be > > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > The affected documents can be obtained via > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4405/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4406/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4407/ > > > > IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-change-sender-id-to-historic/ballot/ > >
