> On Apr 24, 2018, at 3:21 AM, tom p. <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Mahesh
>
> Almost
>
> You ask the RFC Editor to
> "replace reference to RFC XXXX, and draft-ietf-port-twamp-test "
>
> I think that you mean
> draft-ietf-ippm-port-twamp-test
Fixed.
>
> I said that I was still thinking about secret-key and still am; I am
> unsure what secret-key should look like.
>
> There are two rival models for keystore. RTGWG have produced RFC8177
> which has
>
> choice key-string-style {
> ...
> case keystring {
> ..
> type string;
> description "Key string in ASCII format.";
>
> case hexadecimal {
> ..
> type yang:hex-string;
> description "Key in hexadecimal string format.
>
>
> The NETCONF WG have produced a number of I-D, such as
> draft-ietf-netconf-keystore, all of which have keys of type binary.
>
> A YANG string, as this I-D currently references, limits the character
> set of string which I do not think works without a binary or hex-string
> alternative.
>
> I note that
> draft-mirsky-ippm-twamp-light-yang
> went for a keychain-ref while
>
> draft-ietf-ospf-yang
> has
> case auth-trailer-key {
> ...
> type string;
> description "Key string in ASCII format.";
> without a hexadecimal alterntive which would seem to have limited
> entropy.
>
> Perhaps binary, as you had it originally, is best but I do think that
> the IETF is confused, or conflicted, here.
I am reverting it back to binary.
>
> Tom Petch
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mahesh Jethanandani" <mjethanandani@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "tom p." <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Pete Resnick"
> <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <ippm@xxxxxxxx>; <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 5:54 PM
>
> Tom/Pete,
>
> We believe this version of the draft addresses your comments.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> On Apr 23, 2018, at 9:48 AM, internet-drafts@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Measurement WG of the
> IETF.
>>
>> Title : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
> Data Model
>> Authors : Ruth Civil
>> Al Morton
>> Reshad Rahman
>> Mahesh Jethanandani
>> Kostas Pentikousis
>> Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09.txt
>> Pages : 68
>> Date : 2018-04-23
>>
>> Abstract:
>> This document specifies a data model for client and server
>> implementations of the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP).
>> The document defines the TWAMP data model through Unified Modeling
>> Language (UML) class diagrams and formally specifies it using YANG.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang/
>>
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> ippm@xxxxxxxx
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@xxxxxxxxx
>
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@xxxxxxxxx
