Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-kucherawy-dispatch-zstd-01 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 2018-04-19 IETF LC End Date: 2018-04-23 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready with 1 minor issue and some nits. Major issues: 0 Minor issues: 2 Nits/editorial comments: 3 Minor: - S4: "... and the usual precautions apply." Here, what are the "usual precautions"? Are they the ones enumerated below? If so, then perhaps restate as "... and the usual precautions apply, as enumerated below.". If the usual precautions are not enumerated below, then a reference should be provided to a resource(s) that enumerates such precautions. - S5: I am curious, why should we remove this section prior to publication? It contains pointers to code that is invaluable to implementors. At the most, I would advise excising company name (Facebook) from the section, but I would advocate strongly to retain this section as the draft becomes a RFC. Nits/Typos: - S2.1.1: The value of the magic number: 0xFD2FB528 --- is there any significance to it? Any insight on how you arrived at this will be interesting. (I am relating this magic number to the SIP magic cookie "z9hG4bK" which was chosen so that the probability was very small of older implementations to randomly pick a branch ID that started with these characters.) - S2.1.1: s/the origina/the original/ - S2.1.1.3.1.1: "Value ?0" --> should it be "Value 00"?
