Re: [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-tls13-24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/30/18 at 7:35 PM, pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Gutmann) wrote:

As you mention, debugging TLS is unnecessarily painful if there's a problem,
you typically just get a handshake-failed alert which is essentially no
information at all.  Having a debug-mode capability to send back a long-form
error message would be extremely useful, maybe an extension to say "send back
a long-form alert with more than just 'BOOLEAN succeeded = FALSE' in it"..

We have always avoided the long form error messages in TLS because they can be of great help to attackers as well as debuggers. I think this objection is much weaker if we write the long form error messages into a log that is kept with other server logs.

Cheers - Bill

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | Ham radio contesting is a    | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506 | contact sport. | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | - Ken Widelitz K6LA / VY2TT | Los Gatos, CA 95032





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux