Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you for the review Roni! Good catches. 

Seems we forgot to update the EXI example offsets when regenerated the examples. I made a PR to include these fixes in the next revision: https://github.com/core-wg/senml-spec/pull/102/files


Cheers,
Ari

> On 28 Mar 2018, at 8.43, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-core-senml-??
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review Date: 2018-03-27
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-30
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-19
> 
> Summary:
> The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 1. in section 5.1.6 "another devices" should be "other devices" or "another
> device" 2. in section 8  "It can simply hard code the output replacing the
> 1-wire device ID starting at byte 0x20 and going to byte 0x2F with it's device
> ID". I think that the offset ix 0x10 to 0x1f
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux