Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-02 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 2018-02-26 IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-06 IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-05 Summary: This is a simple and straightforward document, fixing an omission in RFC 6275, which updated RFC 4861 without explicitly marking it as such, and failed to create a registry to avoid conflicts. The content of the document looks fine, but there are several minor issues that I would recommend to be considered and discussed before approval and publication. Major issues: Minor issues: 1. As this document fixes a problem created by RFC 6275 which was was not marked as updating RFC 4861, and did not create a registry to avoid conflicts, it looks like this RFC (if approved) should also update RFC 6275. 2. Section 3 includes a reference to [IANA-TBD] which is not defined in the document. 3. As the new registry contains one bit defined by RFC 6275, it seems that [RFC6275] should also be a Normative Reference. 4. Section 4 - It would be good to capitalize Standards Action, and refer to RFC 8126 as reference (also to be added) Nits/editorial comments: 1. The Abstract and the Introduction contain a sentence with broken syntax: 'The purpose of this document is to request that IANA to create a new registry ...' 2. Several acronyms in the document are not explicitly expanded: ND, PIO, NDP
