> the BOF that came up with the inclusion of AD & WG chairs in the list > did not discuss that question > >> from that procedure statements above. Should we expect that we get a >> reply from an AD when sending comment on a WG draft within the IETF >> LC? I think at least one AD is responsible to participate/discuss >> with communities LC comments on this list, some don't think so in >> IETF. >> >> Should we leave final-discussions only to authors/WG which adopted >> the draft? IMO no, but must include one AD discussing those community >> comments. and it did not handle the case where the AD was standing on their left foot with their right turned out. we used to have pride in the ietf for not being a micro-managed rule- based obsessive culture. randy
