Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-trill-ecn-support-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Michael,

I've fixed these nits and posted a -05 version.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx


On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 9:44 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks for the comments, see below.
>
> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Michael Tüxen <tuexen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Reviewer: Michael Tüxen
>> Review result: Ready with Nits
>>
>> I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area directorate's ongoing
>> effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for
>> the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors for
>> their information and to allow them to address any issues raised.
>> When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
>> review together with any other last-call comments they receive.
>> Please always CC tsv-art@xxxxxxxx if you reply to or forward this review.
>>
>> This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication.
>>
>> Nits:
>>
>> Section 1:
>>
>> Old text:
>> This can improve network efficiency through better flow
>> control without packet drops.
>>
>> New text:
>> This can improve network efficiency through better congestion
>> control without packet drops.
>
> OK.
>
>> Old text:
>> This specification provides for any ECN marking in the traffic at the
>> ingress to be copied into the TRILL Extension Header Flags Word.
>>
>> New Text:
>> This specification specifies for any ECN marking in the traffic at the
>> ingress to be copied into the TRILL Extension Header Flags Word.
>
> Well, it specifies how to copy the ECN marking for any traffic and it
> mandates that it be copied from IP traffic but it doesn't and can't
> mandate that it be copied from all arbitrary protocols that might have
> ECN marking...  Also, I don't like "... specification specifies ..."
>
> How about:
> "This document specifies how ECN marking in traffic at the ingress is
> copied into the TRILL Extension Header Flags Word and requires such
> copying for IP traffic."
>
>> Section 2:
>>
>> Old text:
>> after the Extesnion Flags Word.
>>
>> New text:
>> after the Extension Flags Word
>
> OK.
>
>> Section 3.3
>>
>> Please define "3-bit ECN codepoint" and refer to Table 3 BEFORE using it.
>> This might result in swapping Table 2 and Table 3.
>
> We'll look into doing that.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> ===============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]