I've got good comments from some participants regarding the 1st ID IPv10 and most of the other comments were to change the draft name, I read so many RFCs suggested by some few people, and they were related to the IETF sequence of work, and I was waiting for actions to be taken to make a WG or to discuss it within a WG but nothing happened.
Even for the 2nd and 3rd drafts, no reviews happened.
I'm waiting for an action from the people who are responsible for certain areas to make a decision or assign a reviewer or even delete the drafts :-)
Khales
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: More guidance and directions for new drafts/comers (was Re: When the IETF can discuss drafts seriously?
From: "Kevin A. McGrail"
To: Keith Moore
CC: ietf
On 1/26/2018 6:43 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
> IETF does try to be open to new ideas. But people bring new ideas to
> IETF all the time, and statistically speaking, most of those new ideas
> are bad ideas because they are coming from people without enough
> exposure to enough experience that would let them realize that they
> are bad ideas. So experienced IETF participants tend to reject bad
> or dubious ideas in ways that may seem impolite or rude. This is
> (mostly) not because they are rude people overall, it is simply
> because there are so many bad ideas presented here, as a consequence
> of IETF's openness.
Hi Keith,
As another perspective from a lurker trying to help, there is also the
daunting task of having to come up to speed on certain things that are
collective knowledge of decades. I've got one idea I've been honing
that was actually mentioned obliquely literally 20+ years ago.
I appreciated the guidance I was given of "have you seen this RFC"
rather than something more harsh. It helped me find a direction where
my idea might be added and a working group where it can be best debated.
Regards,
KAM