Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:08:19PM +0200,
 Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 418 lines which said:

> I have these questions:
> 
>  1. If I wish to add a new DHCPv4 option as well as a similar DHCPv6
>     iption, would that contravene the intent of this document?
>  2. If I wish to add a field that would permit IPv4 addresses and IPv6
>     addresses, would that contravene the intent of this document?

For me, section 1 of the draft is crystal-clear "No IPv4-only feature
will be added unless there's an equivalent feature added in the IPv6
version." Which means the answer is No to your two questions.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]