Thanks Robert, > I don't have text to suggest, but please look at the first bullet of section 5. > The explanation here was less helpful than the other bullets. Demonstrating the > confusion due to the reuse of the word "service" doesn't help clarify the > confusion. I wonder if there's more conversation that hasn't been captured that > this paragraph is alluding to. Yes, the paragraph is not as clear as it could be. We were trying to distinguish between different uses of the word "service" where we are primarily interested in connectivity services achieved by manipulating the network resources, and not value-added services provided using other resources (compute, storage, ...) that are reachable over the network. I have tried to make this a bit clearer. > (nit) I also suggest raising the level of abstraction in the security > consideration section where it currently lists authorization, authentication, > and encryption by speaking initially to what, and calling the how out as a > detail. OK Adrian