The intent is for the WG to author a results draft with or without justification for moving the work to Standards track.
Greg
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DanHi Alia,Yes, I am aware about this. Yet, there is this little sentence in the WG charter which does not seem to be answered by now :-)
'The scope of the experiment will be documented in the output of the Working Group.'Regards,On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi Dan,On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq >.
Document: draft-ietf-bier-architecture-08
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 2017-09-19
IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-20
IESG Telechat date: 2017-09-28
Summary:
This document is Ready. I have reviewed the previous version (07) and the
resulting discussions with the authors and the edits for the current version
(08) addressed most of the issues raised in the previous review. One single
issue remains open, it is minor, and concerns more the charter scope. However,
as it is related to the Experimental status of the document, I am mentioning it
again. I do not believe it was clarified in the revision or the discussions.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
1. As the document is targeting 'Experimental' it would be useful to mention
what is the scope of the experiment. The charter actually says:
' The scope of the experiment will be
documented in the output of the Working Group.'
Would not the Architecture document be the right place for this? If not, is
there another document that deals or is planned to define the scope of the
experiment?Thanks for the review! The charter has an item (#9, I believe) for describingthe results to progress to standards track.Regards,Alia