---- On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 16:32:39 +0100 Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote ----
>First, the important thing: this is a great step, congratulations to
>the RFC Editor.
>
>On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 09:50:08PM +0100,
> Denis Ovsienko <denis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> a message of 18 lines which said:
>
>> The presence of BOM in a UTF-8 file exactly follows Section 2 of RFC
>> 7994 (Requirements for Plain-Text RFCs).
>
>But section 2 of RFC 5198 says the opposite and, IMHO, it is right.
Well, it looks like "Unicode Format for Network Interchange" was not the intended RFC publication format, otherwise RFCs would have DOS newlines (point 2 of the same section).
--
Denis Ovsienko