Hi, I did not see the text in RFC6006bis but this current text does not say much. If there is some work to reference in PCE like pce-pcep-yang then add it otherwise I suggest to delete this sentence Roni > -----Original Message----- > From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody > Sent: יום ה 17 אוגוסט 2017 12:06 > To: Roni Even; gen-art@xxxxxxxx > Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis.all@xxxxxxxx; pce@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce- > rfc6006bis-03 > > Hi Roni, > > Thanks for your comments. See inline... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roni Even > > Sent: 13 August 2017 19:18 > > To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx > > Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis.all@xxxxxxxx; pce@xxxxxxxx; > > ietf@xxxxxxxx > > Subject: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03 > > > > Reviewer: Roni Even > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > > any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-?? > > Reviewer: Roni Even > > Review Date: 2017-08-13 > > IETF LC End Date: 2017-08-24 > > IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-31 > > > > Summary: The document is ready for publication as standard track RFC > > > > I read all the document and also did a compare with RFC6006 to look at > > the changes. > > > > Major issues: > > > > Minor issues: > > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > 1. In section 4.2 I am not sure why is this sentence there, is it for > > the current yang document or for a future one. Why have it at > > all?-"The PCEP YANG module [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang] can be extended to > > also include the P2MP related parameters." > > > [[Dhruv Dhody]] The text around MIB existed from RFC6006. Since then the > focus has shifted to Yang. > We wanted to keep this text about Yang to reflect that. > > How about we reword to - > > The PCEP YANG model is specified in [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang]. The > YANG models can be augmented to also include the P2MP related > parameters. > > Thanks again for your review. > > Regards, > Dhruv > > Working Copy - https://github.com/dhruvdhody- > huawei/ietf/blob/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list > > Pce@xxxxxxxx > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art