Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That would work for me. I did conclude that the WG was happy with the term, which is why I considered it a nit.

Yours,
Joel

On 8/16/17 11:20 AM, Julien Meuric wrote:
Hi Joel,

Any issue with a request to initiate an LSP setup/teardown to a device? ;-)

I agree the name reads odd, but it has been there for some time now and
the WG seems to be fine with it. Besides, it does not prevent anyone to
add better wording in a patch to their favorite decoding software...

Thanks a lot for your review,

Julien


Aug. 11, 2017 - jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Nits/editorial comments:
     It seems odd to have a message for the creation or deletion of an LSP
     called an LSP Initiate Request.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]