Hello Christian, Thank you for your review. We will apply the suggested updates. --- Alex -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2017 1:16 AM To: rtg-dir@xxxxxxxx Cc: i2rs@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology.all@xxxxxxxx Subject: [i2rs] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-10 Reviewer: Christian Hopps Review result: Has Nits Hello, I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/ The purpose of this review is to determine it's compatibility with the new revised datastore model guidelines. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-10.txt Reviewer: Christian Hopps Review Date: July 8, 2017 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: - This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be considered prior to being submitted to the IESG. Comments: - This document adapts the suggested NMDA guidelines quite nicely. - Perhaps an informative reference to the NMDA guidelines draft would be useful. - Appendix A: Second Paragraph, last sentence: - I believe that it should say: "instead of ietf-network and ietf-network-topology" it currently says: "instead of ietf-network and ietf-network-state" - IS-IS example model (sorry couldn't help myself :) - The example IS-IS l3-node-attributes augmentation isis-node-attributes includes an "iso-pseudonode-id". This isn't a node attribute, but rather a link one (it is repeated later under link attributes). - The isis-wg suggests to use "IS-IS" consistently, where possible, in documents rather than "isis" or "ISIS". _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list i2rs@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs