Re: new DNS classes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In article <D491DDB9-0788-41B4-AD63-586CCA98512E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you write:
>And in the meanwhile, you still say, "new RR types are not hard to 
>deploy"?

Clearly it depends on your frame of reference.  If I needed to publish
some new RRs to enable stealth malware that would prevent a North
Korean nuclear missile launch, I could probably figure out how to do
it using some of Mark's kludges.

In real life, with most configuration software, it's still too hard.

R's,
John




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]