I don't mean to open a discussion into that topic here—I realize that there is no consensus on it, and that this position is not shared by various people, yourself included. I just want to point out that you've expressed it as universally true that people think special-use names are bad, and that is not in fact the case: if it were, we wouldn't need to publish this document.
I didn't say they're bad, I said they're a problem which is not the same thing.
It really isn't helpful to rephrase other people's statements and get them wrong, particularly when everyone can just read the original.
Regards, John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxxx, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly