On 03/05/2017 01:30, Joe Clarke wrote:
...
> NITS:
>
> In your Abstract, you mention RFC6890, but this does not appear to be
> an xref to it, and it should be.
afaik, the RFC Editor style does not allow xrefs in the Abstract.
(Also: draft-bchv-rfc6890bis will update 6890 soon. I don't know whether
that's relevant.)
Brian