Re: Real DMARC damage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As far as I know,
google.com
microsoft.com
yahoo.com
aol.com
are already p=reject

arista.com is p=quarantine.

I think google.com is one of great contributor of ietf mailing list but sometimes old mailing list suspect the mail as spam .
I recovered some mail from my spam folder.
I hope the mailman update to new one.
https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC

Does this mail also suspect spam?

Regards,
-Shishio


On 2017/04/30 6:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Am I the only IETF list admin who's had to deal with genuine DMARC damage today?

gen-art@xxxxxxxx had four subscriptions suspended for excessive bounces, all caused
by mail from one participant whose sending domain has published a p=reject policy

Bizarrely, one of the subscriptions disabled was @gmane.org. It's a very strange
choice for them to respect p=reject.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]