On 11 April 2017 at 18:51, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > (*) That is the argument for draft-mm-effect-encrypt, for which I > do support publication (apparently in disagreement with Martin in > that case:-) Taking a break from email is so refreshing... I would very much like to see a document like this that captures these use cases and practices. The problem I have with it are simple: it isn't particularly coherent, and it makes statements that I disagree with. Those statements are particularly bad because they are also unnecessary (see Brian Carpenter's comments about facts).