Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:42:48 -0700
Cc: iaoc@xxxxxxxx, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3DF53F6ACE338CACF247F910@PSB>
References: <149204035801.15694.8437554373033456064.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <16010f27-e86b-b17d-4a13-62645e0bdc89@cs.tcd.ie> <3DF53F6ACE338CACF247F910@PSB>

I find meetecho to have evolved to being an effective tool, and no
longer intend to attend ietf meetings in person. I'll miss the beer,
company and cookies; won't miss the travel and hotel hassles.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102
  - From: John C Klensin

References:
- Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102
Next by Date: Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102
Previous by thread: Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102
Next by thread: Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]