Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If you haven't seen it, there's also a surveymonkey link about border crossing experiences at IETF 98 that is also appropriate for people who stayed home because of concerns and for US attendees who didn't cross borders, and the last question on the questionnaire is roughly "do you have concerns about future US meetings".

I sent my comments there.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/WMNH9PS

I assume the survey entries will become publicly available at some point - attendee surveys usually do.

Thanks,

Spencer

On Mar 31, 2017 18:58, "Stewart Bryant" <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 31/03/2017 15:42, Eliot Lear wrote:
Hi,


On 3/31/17 9:18 AM, IAOC Chair wrote:
The IAOC remains committed to soliciting input on future IETF meeting locations. With this mail, we are soliciting input on some potential IETF locations, including one where we have met before, but for which conditions may have changed.

Specifically, we seek community input on reasons we could not have a successful meeting in any of the following cities, or of any limits to attendee accessibility or inclusiveness that should be considered:

Ottawa
San Francisco
Austin, TX
Barcelona
Boston
Busan - looks expensive to get to
Calgary - also looks expensive to get to
Denver
Helsinki
Houston
New Orleans
Osaka
Philadelphia
Washington DC

To save everyone doing it, it would be good to show representative airfares and times from a major hub in Europe, East and West Coast, and Asia

I am sure cost and travel time will impact acceptability.

- Stewart


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]