Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:25:43 -0500
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CACweHND9_9x7ZBc0_95keKbkQt8bz6YLJBP06qE=y=-S=GNDRg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
References: <94f81f6a-6a34-6587-a4f7-683586c2f436@dcrocker.net> <CACweHND9_9x7ZBc0_95keKbkQt8bz6YLJBP06qE=y=-S=GNDRg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0

On 3/29/2017 4:19 PM, Matthew Kerwin wrote:

Out of malign curiosity, what would you expect
from: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1738/latest
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc822/latest> ?

cool! bifurcated obsolescence. show both 'latest' documents at thesame time?


d/

--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

References:
- Getting the latest version of an RFC specification
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification
  - From: Matthew Kerwin

Prev by Date: Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification
Next by Date: Re: Predictable Internet Time
Previous by thread: Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification
Next by thread: Re: Getting the latest version of an RFC specification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]