Gorry, > On Mar 26, 2017, at 7:54 PM, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for those coments, which I cut, because I think they can now be turned to text. You asked a question about one comment, see below: > > GF: > Could the WG consider to also add the first two sentences to the security considerations? > Bob: > Sorry, which two sentences? > > These were the two sentences, the rest of the para explained what PMTUD was, and probably could be left to the reader: > > "Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery (PLPMTUD) [RFC4821] does not > rely upon network support for ICMP messages and is therefore > considered more robust than standard PMTUD. It is not susceptible to > "black holing" of ICMP message.” OK, I can add that. Thanks, Bob > > Gorry >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP