Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John, Pete,

I think you’re diving deep into the details of one particular aspect
of this problem. That’s fine, but I wanted to point out that the overall
issues are broader. Even on the aspect of creating pushback for
authorities generating unnecessary subpoenas, there are multiple
approaches, document distribution within the leadership is just one
way.

And then there are other issues, worrying about the privacy
of the people mentioned in any subpoena, re-examining if we
could tune what information we retain at the IETF, rewriting the
algorithm on what our staff should do automatically and when
they need to alert the leadership, looking at what other organisations
have done in these kinds of situations, and so on.

FWIW, I think we at the legal committee and leadership want to be on
listening and learning mode about this issue for a while before
jumping into specific ways to address the issues. Keep those thoughts
coming!

Jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]