Den 17. mars 2017 19:18, skrev Jon Mitchell: > Reviewer: Jon Mitchell > Review result: Ready > > I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's > > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. These > comments were written with the intent of improving the operational > aspects of the > IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be > included in AD reviews > during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat > these comments > just like any other last call comments. > > This document is an overall of the WebRTC protocols that are > considered a "minimum" set to claim compliance with the standard the > draft sets forth. As far as I can tell, no new protocols or > implementation details are contained in the draft and operational > concerns largely are covered (or not) by the many referenced protocol > specifications within it. Therefore, I believe this draft is Ready, > although there is some question in my mind of whether this is actually > a standards track versus best current practice document as > interoperability from the standpoint of this document seems to not > require any new on the wire negotiation (outside of each individual's > protocols negotiations). > > Thanks for the review! At one point I wondered if the correct designation for this document was the rarely-used "Applicability Statement". The WG decided to not do process experiments with this one, but did want it on the standards track - ie "informational" was not appropriate. AS documents are standards-track documents.