Why does this I-D make no mention of YANG 1.1, which has been around for a while now (albeit not superseding YANG 1.0)? Has the YANG module been validated against YANG 1.1? Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 4:23 PM > > The IESG has received a request from the Routing Area Working Group WG > (rtgwg) to consider the following document: > - 'Routing Key Chain YANG Data Model' > <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-15.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2017-04-07. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document describes the key chain YANG data model. A key chain > is a list of elements each containing a key string, send lifetime, > accept lifetime, and algorithm (authentication or encryption). By > properly overlapping the send and accept lifetimes of multiple key > chain elements, key strings and algorithms may be gracefully updated. > By representing them in a YANG data model, key distribution can be > automated. Key chains are commonly used for routing protocol > authentication and other applications. In some applications, the > protocols do not use the key chain element key directly, but rather a > key derivation function is used to derive a short-lived key from the > key chain element key (e.g., the Master Keys used in the TCP > Authentication Option. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >