Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard

[Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 3/20/17 21:39, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> OTOH, I will agree that the choice of 666 as the response code here 
> was not incidental - it clearly was chosen with that "Number of the 
> Beast" connotation in mind. In that sense the choice was gratuitous. 


I would argue "mnemonic" rather than "gratuitous" -- similar to the 
"451" response code selected by RFC 7725.

/a