Hi, I will change it to the IESG address :) Regards, Christer On 17/03/17 17:23, "Ben Campbell" <ben@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >(as an individual) > >I recognize we have not been consistent, but I also favor using the IESG >address for this sort of thing. It's one of the least ephemeral contacts >we have. Individuals change addresses and responsibilities. Some people >use WG lists, but we have more than one WG list kept open way beyond its >otherwise useful life because of registrations that pointed to it. > >Thanks! > >Ben. > >On 17 Mar 2017, at 10:09, Christer Holmberg wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Since this document is going to be standards-track, I think the >>> contact >>> for the dtls-id registration should be the IESG instead of the >>> author. >> >> Personally I don¹t have a strong preference, but there are a number >> of >> similar RFCs where the author is listed. A 30 second search gives me >> RFC >> 4853, RFC 4574Š >> >> In another RFC (sorry, I closed the browser tab and forgot the number) >> the >> WG chair mail address was listed. >> >> So, it seems like there is no strict rule. >> >> Regards, >> >> Christer >> >> >> >>>> On Mar 17, 2017, at 9:18 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> The IESG has received a request from the Multiparty Multimedia >>>> Session >>>> Control WG (mmusic) to consider the following document: >>>> - 'Using the SDP Offer/Answer Mechanism for DTLS' >>>> <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22.txt> as Proposed Standard >>>> >>>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and >>>> solicits >>>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to >>>> the >>>> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2017-04-06. Exceptionally, comments >>>> may >>>> be >>>> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the >>>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >>>> >>>> Abstract >>>> >>>> >>>> This document defines the SDP offer/answer procedures for >>>> negotiating >>>> and establishing a DTLS association. The document also defines >>>> the >>>> criteria for when a new DTLS association must be established. The >>>> document updates RFC 5763 and RFC 7345, by replacing common SDP >>>> offer/answer procedures with a reference to this specification. >>>> >>>> This document defines a new SDP media-level attribute, 'dtls-id'. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The file can be obtained via >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp/ >>>> >>>> IESG discussion can be tracked via >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp/ballot/ >>>> >>>> >>>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>