Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2017-03-16 01:21, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Thanks for your review, Russ. For what it is worth, I agree with your comment/question about the credentials. It is fine to have different arrangements for different situations, but Russ’s question was really not about that but whether the CA information mentioned earlier is a part of a specific part of the information model (ma-credentials). I think that deserves clarification.
> 
> Jari
> 

This was exactly the point I was also trying to make.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]