On 16 March 2017 at 03:16, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stefano, > On 16/03/2017 04:55, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote: > ... >> In the mean time, I think it is way too premature to come to conclusion on what text should be used for RFC2460bis and I recommend that the current text is left unchanged until we figured out what to do with EH insertion. > > I believe that we have figured it out: extension header insertion is harmful to Internet interoperability. I and others were going to work on an ID describing why, however the other co-authors seem to have disappeared. I'll start putting together what I have over the next week. Regards, Mark. > > I fully agree with Suresh's understanding of the rough consensus. > > Brian > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@xxxxxxxx > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > --------------------------------------------------------------------