Re: More haste, less speed.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yo Viktor!

On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:30:30 -0500
Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Security Policy can benefit from DNSSEC but it absolutely does not
> > require DNSSEC to provide value.  
> 
> This is not true for SMTP, which is vulnerable to downgrade attacks
> if the security policy is not made tamper-resistant.

Please do not make the best the enemy of the merely better.  Often a
little better is good enough for now.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem@xxxxxxxxxx  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin

Attachment: pgpIb3tqjldms.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]