On 02/24/2017 12:11 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: [....] >> >> I just want the -bis document to reflect what is currently in the field >> and we know works. Nothing more, nothing less. > > I wholly agree with this as it applies to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis. > > As a general comment, it should be reiterated that operational feedback > is critical to standards development and that if field deployment issues > are neglected, this damages the standards development process. It would > be unfortunate if this document fell prey to this folly. +1 -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492