Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets

[Sander Steffann <sander@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

> something like a /96 would have served the aspect "more machines than you can
> imagine per subnet" perfectly well.

Yeah, I wish we had chose something like that in the past as well :(

Cheers,
Sander

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>