Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:34:32PM +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> I don't think you can say nothing in the past matters here. We know that
> there have been host implementations that relied on this guarantee, and we
> have to consider that if we change the standard, those implementations will
> become non-compliant.

Details, please.  Besides SLAAC not working (because not defined), which
implementations will not work with non-/64 network length?

You might know, but if you say "we know", it's not including myself (yet).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]