In reviewing the document I noticed a small nit. Otherwise it looks okay to me,. In section 3.1: s/Sections 4.1 and 4.3 [RFC2860]/Sections 4.1 and 4.3 of [RFC2860]/ Russ > On Feb 10, 2017, at 10:15 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > - 'Special-Purpose IP Address Registries' > <draft-bchv-rfc6890bis-04.txt> as Best Current Practice > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2017-03-10. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This memo updates the IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Registries to > address issues raised by the definition of a global prefix. For > completeness, this memo contains all the assignments made to the IANA > Special-Purpose Address Registries. > > This memo obsoletes RFC 6890. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bchv-rfc6890bis/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bchv-rfc6890bis/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > >