Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:47 PM, <sthaug@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
1000 /64 links for every /65-126 link may well be the case. However,
plenty of non /64 links exist, and I see no sign of them going
away. Claiming that all IIDs are 64 bit is simply incorrect, and
doesn't reflect operational reality no matter how hard you try to
make that claim.

I'm not saying that all IIDs are 64 bits. I'm saying that as a percentage of the Internet, more code is deployed that expects/requires 64 bit IIDs than links than non-/64 links. So if we want to make the standard reflect reality, then we should keep it as is.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]