Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Host developers could just as well claim "this is just network ops telling
> us what we should do do and denying what we actually do and intend to keep
> on doing".

how is that working out for dual-stack and dhcp android users?

What do you mean? Are you saying that host developers don't always and automatically do what network operators want them to do? If that's motivated by the fact that they are acting in their users' interests, it seems to me that they are justified in doing so, and in fact, would be remiss not to.

> With the difference that the standards clearly specify what the current
> state of affairs is.

and now we need to make the wannabe document match what the state of
affairs is in networking.

That doesn't mean "we've been violating the standards, so now the standards have to change to match what we've been doing, even if other parties are depending on the standards", does it? :-)

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]