Le 22/02/2017 à 18:46, Lorenzo Colitti a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:markzzzsmith@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Let's leave behind unnecessary practices that have been used to extend IPv4's life, and that make things unnecessarily complicated and more costly to operate and troubleshoot. What he said.
I think this comparison to IPv4 is non-sense. I think IPv6 should benefit from IPv4 experience of no-fixed-length Interface ID and DHCP. I think you should try the experience of trying to persuade ISPs to involve DHCPv6 PD before you can claim networks can grow in the presence of this /64 limit. Or otherwise tell when the smartphones 'tether' by using a Standards Track protocol. Until then there is no reason to have a /64 recommendation. Alex