Le 20/02/2017 à 19:32, David Farmer a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Do you think it makes sense to cite RFC 7934 as well? There is text in there that also justifies the 64 bit boundary. I think a reference to RFC 7934 absolutely belong in the IPv6 Addressing Architecture,
I agree. I read that RFC7934 again because a new errata points to an earlier RFC1681 mentioning additional reasons for needing multiple IP addresses per Host: e.g. a ppp Router. I would appreciate if RFC4291bis considered the /64 limit too in light of today's IoT Routers connecting to cellular operators. How would such cellular IoT Router live with /64-everywhere of current cellular operators?
but it seems more appropriate in section 2.1, maybe the second paragraph or even a new paragraph in that section.
Section 2.1 looks good to receive a reference for RFC7934. Alex
-- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@xxxxxxx <mailto:Email%3Afarmer@xxxxxxx> Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================