Re: Possible ambiguity of Hop-by-Hop Options header processing text in draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2/19/2017 3:14 PM, C. M. Heard wrote:
> ...
> On that basis I would like to suggest changing the note as follows:
>
>    NOTE: While [RFC2460] required that all nodes must examine and
>    process the Hop-by-Hop Options header, it is now expected that nodes
>    along a packet's delivery path, other than the source and destination
>    nodes, will examine and process the Hop-by-Hop Options header only if
>    explicitly configured to do so.
>
It would be useful to be more clear about destination - e.g., as
indicated up the destination IP address.

I.e., AFAICT an intermediate stop of a "loose source route" (using the
routing header) should be able to alter the HBH headers at will.

Joe




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]