Re: Last Call: Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Last Call: Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed standard
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:10:14 -0800
In-reply-to: <148735040735.19992.5678820892795925914.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148735040735.19992.5678820892795925914.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>

Moving these algorithms to standards track is a good idea, and longoverdue.

On the other hand, turning "uplifting" into a verb is a terrible idea."Promoting" is a perfectly valid term for this action.


--Paul Hoffman

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
Previous by thread: Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18
Next by thread: Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]