Re: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/17/2017 01:10 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Joel, 
> 
> In my opinion the motivation behind section 5.8.2 is to make sure that, if a PCC needs to request a path to be computed by PCE immediately, PCC should use the existing PCReq message to achieve that. 
>  
> Can the PCC delegate an unsignalled LSP to PCE via PCRpt message? In my interpretation it can, in some cases[1]. I would let the authors confirm on this. 

Yes, it can.

The second paragraph on 5.8.2 is not intended to restrict usage of
delegation, but rather highlight the scenario where the LSP is
established without PCE's help.

Regards,
Robert

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]