Re: To "lose the argument in the WG"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In case it isn’t widely known, there is a button on the datatracker page for the draft ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-something-or-other ) that says “Request review”.

Click that and request from any of the 8 review teams.

Yoav

> On 15 Feb 2017, at 2:06, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> There is a procedure (that I thought was pretty widely known) that allows chairs to request early cross-are review when they think it is helpful.  I know that several of the review teams support this.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 2/14/17 6:56 PM, Randall Gellens wrote:
>> At 12:18 PM +1300 2/15/17, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> 
>>> 2. As a Gen-ART reviewer I've often seen drafts at IETF LC that
>>> really *need* a general, in-depth review.
>> 
>> As a document author, I appreciate the area reviews done by GEN, SEC,
>> etc.  However, I think they would be just as useful and perhaps more
>> timely if done during WGLC (assuming the WG does a WGLC).
>> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]