Thanks Joel,
-11 only contains the fixes to the comments received by Jan. 17. I am now applying all the edits needed for the comments received after that.
The next version will fix the problem you have pointed out.
Best,
Nat
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:03 AM Joel Halpern <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-??
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2017-02-02
IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-13
IESG Telechat date: 2017-02-16
Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed
Standard
Major issues: N/A
Minor issues:
Why is the example if section 4 (and others later on) described
as
"non-normative"? Is it incomplete? incorrect? An example is, by
definition, not a full specification. The language seems designed to
reduce the value of the example. I would recommend removing all the
"non-normative" notes from the examples. They are clearly stated to
be examples.
Nits/editorial comments:
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
--
Nat Sakimura
Chairman of the Board, OpenID Foundation