Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lars,

> the last paragraph of the introduction reads:
> 
>   An extension to Path MTU Discovery defined in this document can be
>   found in [RFC4821].  It defines a method for Packetization Layer Path
>   MTU Discovery (PLPMTUD) designed for use over paths where delivery of
>   ICMP messages to a host is not assured.
> 
> Given that ICMP delivery cannot be assured over the vast majority of paths in the current Internet, should this document make a recommendation to implement RFC4821?

Could you please substantiate that assertion?

Best regards,
Ole

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]